The author's note of the novel creates ambiguity as to how much of the novel is fiction. An author's note is typically non-fiction, so one would expect that to be the case for Life of Pi. It most certainly holds true for the first part of the note. Martel's description of the release of his second piece of writing certainly depicts reality. This creates trust in the reader's mind. However, the author's note also claims this story was narrated to him by the main character. A claim which is suspect at best.
The mood of the chapter is set very quickly. It is clear it has a dark, gloomy mood in the very first line, "My suffering left me sad and gloomy." (Martel 3) Because this sentence is so short, its seriousness is amplified. There is no "fluffy" language, it's very straight-forward. For me, this immediately made me see the main character as a very depressed and dark individual. It also makes me wonder what event(s) caused him to be suffering. Even when talking about things which should be positive, the narrator still makes the mood negative. For example, when talking about how much he loves Canada, he mostly focuses on all of the things he misses about India. The mood is supported by the last anecdote in the chapter. Rather than describing his first visit to an Indian restaurant as a positive thing, the narrator focuses on the negatives of the visit. This kept me in a negative mindset. The first-person point of view contributes to the mood as well, through the narrator's negative comments about himself.
The character of Mr. Patel is developed throughout the first chapter as a very broken man. For instance, he explains he chose to study the sloth because it "did something to soothe [his] shattered self." (Martel 3) By referencing himself as shattered, Mr. Patel essentially straight up tells the reader he is broken. The language in this sentence essentially creates juxtaposition between himself and the sloth. He describes the sloth's demeanour as "calm, quiet, and introspective" (Martel 3) which is almost opposite of how he describes himself. The author invites the reader to infer that the main character has experienced some trauma in the past that left him so broken.
The character is further developed with the passage regarding Richard Parker. When Mr. Patels discusses the pain caused by Richard's abandonment of him as "like an axe that chops at my heart" (Martel 7) the reader gains some insight as to what might have contributed to Patel being so broken. The language in this passage is very important. It is important to note that he doesn't say "...an axe that chopped at my heart" but rather "an axe that chops at my heart" (emphasis mine). This implies that the pain is ongoing, rather than just a one-time thing.
The author introduces the conflict in the novel without actually letting the reader know what the conflict is. The narrator describes all of the aftermath of the conflict without actually letting the reader know what caused that aftermath. The author does this to create a suspenseful build up to when he finally does reveal the conflict. The narrator hints at conflicting involving Richard Parker, "I still cannot understand how he could abandon me so unceremoniously, without any sort of goodbye, without looking back even once," (Martel 7) but does not even expand on who Richard Parker is. That passage suggests Patel is harbouring some ill-feelings toward Richard, but also describes dreams involving him as "nightmares tinged with love." (Martel 7) From this I infer that Patel and Richard once had a strong relationship that ended poorly. This causes Patel to have mixed feelings towards him; on one hand, he remembers all of the great times they had, but also the pain he caused him.
The first chapter of Life of Pi raises more questions than it answers. Who is Richard Parker? What made Patel so broken? Why is he in a hospital in Mexico? The first chapter essentially serves as an introduction to the narrator and entices the reader into continuing the novel.
No comments:
Post a Comment